What is the illegal investigation of the yoga studio? is it legal for personal non-disciplinary training?

Makeafortune 2 0
  1. Is individual non-disciplinary training legal?
  2. Is it legal for fitness cards not to be transferred?
  3. Online teachers secretly photographed girls practicing yoga and sent chat groups, and Beiyu responded that "the work of the worker has been suspended." what is the follow-up situation?

Is individual non-disciplinary training legal?

Personal non-disciplinary training is legal in most cases. These trainings are usually set up to improve personal skills or interests, such as music, painting, yoga, etc. However, specific legal provisions may vary from country to country and region, so local authorities should be consulted to ensure legitimacy before offering training. In addition, training institutions should also abide by relevant laws and regulations, such as providing qualified teachers and protecting the rights and interests of students.

What is the illegal investigation of the yoga studio? is it legal for personal non-disciplinary training?

Personal non-disciplinary training is legal in most cases. However, the specific legitimacy may vary according to the legal provisions of regions and countries.

In general, individual non-disciplinary training does not require a special license or certification, but may need to comply with relevant business registration and tax regulations. It is recommended that local legal experts be consulted before conducting individual non-disciplinary training to ensure legitimacy.

Is it legal for fitness cards not to be transferred?

If the membership cards handled by the gym are real-name system, it is reasonable not to allow the transfer. After all, every fitness store has its own rules and rules, so if you need to return the card, you should inform the store in advance whether it can be transferred. If he does not allow it, you can refund the fee, and if you do not return it, you can sue him.

Online teachers secretly photographed girls practicing yoga and sent chat groups, and Beiyu responded that "the work of the worker has been suspended." what is the follow-up situation?

It is not recommended that this kind of online reporting prevails, which is convicted for words, and the expansion of such cases will have serious consequences.

There is an essential difference in creating a yellow ballad at Suzhou University. It is just taking pictures of girls in a yoga studio to get high, and there may be the idea of materializing women, which is really inappropriate.

However, this kind of behavior is far from breaking the law or committing a crime, and suspending work is a bit of a heavy punishment, not to mention criticism and education.

The Internet is a virtual and real world, netizens are often willing to criticize some things and some people, and there is a lot of hostility when speaking online.

Netizens' behavior on the Internet is particularly in line with the rabble, lack of independent thinking, and particularly radical, and then drift with the tide.

Each unit should pay attention to the network public opinion, but should not pay too much attention to the public opinion, if according to the netizens' opinion, this teacher should be shot.

But in fact, according to the law and school rules and regulations, it may be enough to criticize education and give warnings.

According to the Civil Code, privacy is the peace of a natural person's private life and private space, private activities and private information that he does not want to know for others. This kind of yoga class belongs to a public place, and everyone is doing public sports, which is not private.

From the perspective of public security organs, the person's behavior does not violate the law of public security management punishment, only peeping, secretly filming, eavesdropping, and spreading other people's privacy constitute an illegal act. Or it is illegal for that person to openly insult or slander others on the Internet.

Therefore, the person has no basis for administrative punishment by the public security organs, but may be suspected of infringing the right to portrait.

Feminist egalitarianism is worthy of respect, but using this kind of public opinion to label and implicate, one day male netizens will oppose and hate, the prevalence of feminism will inevitably lead to male chauvinism, too much.

Under the Weibo of Beijing language and Culture University, there are already particularly clear and opposing views.

Law on punishment for Public Security Administration

Article 42 whoever commits any of the following acts shall be detained for not more than five days or a fine of not more than 500 yuan; if the circumstances are relatively serious, the offender shall be detained for not less than five days and not more than ten days, and a fine of not more than 500 yuan may be imposed concurrently:

(1) writing threatening letters or threatening the personal safety of others by other means

(2) openly insulting others or fabricating facts to slander others

(3) fabricating facts and falsely accusing others of framing others in an attempt to subject others to criminal investigation or administrative punishment for public security

(4) threatening, insulting, beating or retaliating against witnesses and their close relatives

(5) sending obscene, insulting, threatening or other information many times to interfere with the normal life of others

(6) peeping, secretly filming, eavesdropping or spreading the privacy of others.

Article 1032 of the Civil Code A natural person shall enjoy the right to privacy. No organization or individual may infringe upon the privacy of others by means of spying, intrusive, divulging, disclosure, etc.

Privacy is the peace of the private life of a natural person and the private space, private activities and private information that others do not want to know.